8308.T

Fairly Valued

Resona Holdings, Inc. — PEG Ratio Analysis

1.12

PEG Ratio

PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies — earnings are driven by interest margins and provisions

PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies

1.12

Growth Rate Source

Good Data Quality5-Year EPS CAGR

Current Price

$2039.50

TTM EPS

$113.71

P/E Ratio

17.94

Growth Rate

16.0%

5-Year EPS CAGR

Sector

Financial Services

Banks - Regional

Calculated

7/7/2026

5:45:18 AM

Peer Comparison

Sample Size

5 peers

Industry Median PEG

0.64

25th Percentile

0.57

75th Percentile

0.65

8308.T PEG (1.12) vs Industry Median (0.64): 75% premium

Symbol	Company	PEG	P/E	Growth	vs 8308.T
8316.T	Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.	0.52	14.1	27.0%	-53%
8306.T	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.	0.57	16.3	28.6%	-49%
8309.T	Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc.	0.64	12.1	18.9%	-43%
8411.T	Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.	0.65	14.3	22.0%	-42%
8601.T	Daiwa Securities Group Inc.	0.99	12.0	12.1%	-11%

How to Interpret PEG Ratio

PEG < 1.0 — Potentially Undervalued. The stock may be priced below its earnings growth rate, suggesting a potential buying opportunity.

PEG 1.0–2.0 — Fairly Valued. The stock price is roughly in line with its earnings growth. A PEG of 1.0 is often considered "fair value."

PEG > 2.0 — Potentially Overvalued. The stock may be priced above what its earnings growth justifies.

Limitations:PEG ratios are less reliable for financial firms (earnings driven by interest margins), companies with negative/zero earnings growth, and hypergrowth companies (>100% growth) where the ratio may appear misleadingly low. Always use PEG alongside other valuation metrics.