8766.T

N/A

Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. — PEG Ratio Analysis

—

PEG Ratio

Negative EPS growth — PEG not meaningful when earnings are declining

PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies — earnings are driven by interest margins and provisions

PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies

—

Growth Rate Source

Limited Data Quality1-Year EPS CAGR

Current Price

$7111.00

TTM EPS

$513.87

P/E Ratio

13.84

Growth Rate

-4.9%

1-Year EPS CAGR

Sector

Financial Services

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Calculated

6/17/2026

9:05:49 AM

PEG Ratio Unavailable

Negative Growth — PEG not meaningful

Peer Comparison

Sample Size

4 peers

Industry Median PEG

0.52

25th Percentile

0.52

75th Percentile

2.42

Symbol	Company	PEG	P/E	Growth	vs 8766.T
8725.T	MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.	0.18	8.1	44.0%	—
8316.T	Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.	0.52	14.1	27.0%	—
8306.T	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.	0.52	15.0	28.6%	—
9432.T	NTT, Inc.	2.42	11.9	4.9%	—

How to Interpret PEG Ratio

PEG < 1.0 — Potentially Undervalued. The stock may be priced below its earnings growth rate, suggesting a potential buying opportunity.

PEG 1.0–2.0 — Fairly Valued. The stock price is roughly in line with its earnings growth. A PEG of 1.0 is often considered "fair value."

PEG > 2.0 — Potentially Overvalued. The stock may be priced above what its earnings growth justifies.

Limitations:PEG ratios are less reliable for financial firms (earnings driven by interest margins), companies with negative/zero earnings growth, and hypergrowth companies (>100% growth) where the ratio may appear misleadingly low. Always use PEG alongside other valuation metrics.