Enel S.p.A.
High uncertainty:The valuation methods show significant disagreement (>100% spread). Treat the range as a rough guide rather than a precise estimate.
Bear Case (25th pct.)
-65.1% vs price
Base Case (Median)
-52.9% vs price
Bull Case (75th pct.)
-7.0% vs price
◇ = Current price | |Bear |Base | Bull
| Method | Est. Value | vs Price | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) | $11.40 | -1.4% | High (40%) |
| PE Comparable | $5.45 | -52.8% | Medium (25%) |
| Growth Trajectory DCF | $3.16 | -72.7% | Medium (20%) |
| Graham Number | $4.90 | -57.6% | Medium (40%) |
| EV/EBITDA | $18.66 | 61.4% | Medium (20%) |
| EV/FCF | $10.09 | -12.7% | Medium (20%) |
| Earnings Power Value | $2.23 | -80.7% | Medium (50%) |
Based on 7 out of 8 methods, ESOCF appears overvalued at the current price of $11.56. The base case fair value of $5.45 implies 52.9% downside.
Bear/base/bull cases represent the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of available method estimates. This is not financial advice. Valuation is inherently uncertain.