PT Golden Energy Mines Tbk
High uncertainty:The valuation methods show significant disagreement (>100% spread). Treat the range as a rough guide rather than a precise estimate.
Bear Case (25th pct.)
-100.0% vs price
Base Case (Median)
-100.0% vs price
Bull Case (75th pct.)
-100.0% vs price
◇ = Current price | |Bear |Base | Bull
| Method | Est. Value | vs Price | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) | $0.14 | -100.0% | High (40%) |
| PE Comparable | $0.64 | -100.0% | Medium (25%) |
| Growth Trajectory DCF | $1.72 | -100.0% | Medium (20%) |
| Graham Number | $0.37 | -100.0% | Medium (40%) |
| EV/EBITDA | $0.67 | -100.0% | Medium (20%) |
| EV/FCF | $0.77 | -100.0% | Medium (20%) |
| Earnings Power Value | $2.04 | -100.0% | Medium (50%) |
Based on 7 out of 8 methods, GEMS.JK appears overvalued at the current price of $6750.00. The base case fair value of $0.67 implies 100.0% downside.
Bear/base/bull cases represent the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of available method estimates. This is not financial advice. Valuation is inherently uncertain.