PE ratio relative to earnings growth — is the valuation justified?
—
PEG Ratio
Negative EPS growth — PEG not meaningful when earnings are declining
PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies — earnings are driven by interest margins and provisions
PEG ratio is generally unreliable for Financial Services companies
—
Growth Rate Source
Good Data Quality5-Year EPS CAGR
Current Price
$15.77
TTM EPS
$6.33
P/E Ratio
2.49
Growth Rate
-10.5%
5-Year EPS CAGR
Sector
Financial Services
Asset Management
Calculated
8/20/2026
12:36:43 AM
PEG Ratio Unavailable
Negative Growth — PEG not meaningful
Peer Comparison
Sample Size
2 peers
Industry Median PEG
1.03
25th Percentile
0.12
75th Percentile
1.94
Symbol
Company
PEG
P/E
Growth
vs HQL
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
0.12
3.3
26.5%
—
JPI
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Opportunities Fund
1.94
13.7
7.1%
—
How to Interpret PEG Ratio
PEG < 1.0 — Potentially Undervalued. The stock may be priced below its earnings growth rate, suggesting a potential buying opportunity.
PEG 1.0–2.0 — Fairly Valued. The stock price is roughly in line with its earnings growth. A PEG of 1.0 is often considered "fair value."
PEG > 2.0 — Potentially Overvalued. The stock may be priced above what its earnings growth justifies.
Limitations:PEG ratios are less reliable for financial firms (earnings driven by interest margins), companies with negative/zero earnings growth, and hypergrowth companies (>100% growth) where the ratio may appear misleadingly low. Always use PEG alongside other valuation metrics.
