Fair value · Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT) · updated 2026-08-28 · from annual report FY2025
We need at least two valuation methods with usable inputs from the company’s SEC filings. The detailed valuation tools below still work with whatever has been filed.
annual report FY2025 · fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · filed 2026-04-13 · accession 0001213900-26-042974
Trailing-twelve-month EPS also uses the quarterly 6-Ks through Q1 FY2023 (filed 2023-05-17).
Open this filing on sec.govPEG Ratio is not meaningful: Insufficient price/EPS data
Interpretation
PEG = P/E ÷ Annual EPS Growth Rate (%). Peter Lynch's growth-adjusted value metric.
EV/EBITDA is not meaningful: Negative EBITDA — ratio not meaningful
Interpretation
EV/EBITDA = Enterprise Value ÷ EBITDA. Capital-structure neutral — preferred by professional investors.
Interpretation
P/S = Market Cap ÷ Revenue. Useful for growth/unprofitable companies. SaaS/high-growth norms higher.
P/B Ratio is not meaningful: Negative book value — P/B not meaningful
Meaningful metric for Industrials
Interpretation
P/B = Price ÷ Book Value per Share. Essential for banks, REITs, and asset-heavy companies.
Graham Number is not meaningful: Negative or zero EPS — Graham Number not meaningful
Interpretation
√(22.5 × EPS × Book Value/Share) — Benjamin Graham's intrinsic value estimate.
EPV not meaningful: Negative operating earnings
Greenwald EPV assumes zero future growth — this is the floor value of the business as a going concern.
Download the full MRT valuation report (PDF) — free
DCF fair value, Graham number, EPV, key multiples and growth rates in one clean PDF.
